Exercise R Us

Question:

I actually met this slimeball myself.  He lives in Bangor, Maine where my wife & I used to live.  My wife knew Tobin when they both went to Bates College, you know one of those "liberal" Northeast colleges. This guys is typical of the Karl Rove, "New" Republican thinking, i.e., the end justifies the means. I believe he’s up for sentencing & could get 5 years in prison. Former RNC New England Regional Director Convicted In New Hampshire Phone Jamming Case -http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2005/December/05_crm_672.html. "WASHINGTON, D.C. — After a four-day trial, a jury in Concord, New Hampshire today convicted James Tobin, the former New England Regional Director of the Republican National Committee, of charges stemming from a scheme to disrupt phone service to five Democratic Party offices and a firefighters’ ride-to-the-polls program on Election Day 2002, the Department of Justice announced today." Federal judge lowers sentence for man who testified against Tobin – http://www.boston.com/news/local/maine/articles/2006/02/06/federal_ju… Mr Soul

Response:

> "New" Republican thinking, i.e., > the end justifies the means.

That typifies YOUR approach! Too late to play that game, you have been caught.

> The clause was not right above his signature, so please stop lying.

I will NOT let YOUR LYING go any more. PROVE the location of the CLAUSE. You know damn well that it was on a page PREVIOUS to the one that Franken signed, you LYING FOOL. You have admitted that the clause was IN the Agreement, so it was either BEFORE or AFTER Franken’s signature. PROVE the location of the CLAUSE. PROVE it you LYING ASSHOLE.

Response:

> > "New" Republican thinking, i.e., > the end justifies the means. > That typifies YOUR approach!

Nope. Yours.

Response:

You need to calm down.  Have you considered mediation? Mr Soul

Response:

>You need to calm down.  Have you considered mediation?

…or meditiation, or even medication…        Posted via TITANnews – Uncensored Newsgroups Access              >>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<< -=Every Newsgroup – Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

Response:

Do you notice the level of detail he goes to investigate Democrat’s and/or calling liberals liars? Mr Soul

Response:

Boy they’re dropping like flies today – Ex-governor [Republican] convicted of racketeering – http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12356536/. Too bad & I kind of liked this guy, given his position on the death penalty. Mr Soul

Response:

From an indy’s observation……Franken was hilarious on SNL, but like all hollywood types, should have stayed there, no one listens to their spewing, well actually they DO listen, but those types have no effect on the outcome of anything thank goodness. They are entertainers, the only thing they are good at is entertaining, so shut up and entertain. But come to think of it, the spewing is entertaining as well. Listening to an actor or musician rant on politics is the same as having to watch commercials in a movie friggin down.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> "New" Republican thinking, i.e., >> the end justifies the means. >That typifies YOUR approach! > Quit changing the subject, asshole.  What, no comments on widespread > Republican corruption and dirty tricks, subversion of democracy?  All you > can do is bring up Al Franken… who isn’t even a politician or an elected > official.

Response:

More on this – http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060410/ap_on_go_pr_wh/election_phone_jam…. Tobin actually made two dozen calls to the WH during a period of 3 days around the election.  I wonder who he called there? The RNC has spend over $2 million defending this guy. Mr Soul

Response:

> You need to calm down.  Have you considered mediation?

Too funny! We are still waiting for you to verify your latest LIE. > I’ve already said where the clause is – can you read?

Back in Feb you stated that there was NO such clause. You then posted a link and told me to find it. I found it. Then you admitted to the existence of the clause, but denied what it meant. It means what it says since amazingly, WORDS mean things! Two days ago, you said that the clause was in the middle of the Agreement. I called you on that and you later admitted that it was NOT in the middle. I them stated that the clause was above Franken’s signature. Then…

> The clause was not right above his signature, so please stop lying.

I will NOT let YOUR LYING go any more. PROVE the location of the CLAUSE. You know damn well that it was on a page PREVIOUS to the one that Franken signed, you LYING FOOL. You have admitted that the clause was IN the Agreement, so it was either BEFORE or AFTER Franken’s signature. You made the claim now PROVE the location of the CLAUSE.

Response:

> Do you notice the level of detail he goes to investigate Democrat’s > and/or calling liberals liars?

The level of detail is purely to expose you, and your lies. We are still waiting for you to verify your latest LIE. > I’ve already said where the clause is – can you read?

Back in Feb you stated that there was NO such clause. You then posted a link and told me to find it. I found it. Then you admitted to the existence of the clause, but denied what it meant. It means what it says since amazingly, WORDS mean things! Two days ago, you said that the clause was in the middle of the Agreement. I called you on that and you later admitted that it was NOT in the middle. I them stated that the clause was above Franken’s signature. Then…

> The clause was not right above his signature, so please stop lying.

I will not let your lying by go any more. PROVE the location of the CLAUSE. You know damn well that it was on a page PREVIOUS to the one that Franken signed, you LYING FOOL. You have admitted that the clause was IN the Agreement, so it was either BEFORE or AFTER Franken’s signature. Time to verify your claim and PROVE the location of the clause.

Response:

> clause

Boring. And stupid. Give up. You’ve lost.

Response:

Have you consider green tea?  I would stop injusting all caffeine if I were you.  I would also consider yoga in place of swing dancing.  My guess is that dancing just jazz’s you up. Mr Soul

Response:

Show us one conservative and/or Republican that you have paid such careful attention to the details.  You won’t be able to find any because there are none.  You are as biased and partisan as they come and if you would just admit, we could all let the aminosities drop. Mr Soul

Response:

"injusting" should read "ingesting".  Man – I need a spell checker on Google.

Response:

> Show us one conservative and/or Republican that you have paid such > careful attention to the details.

There haven’t been any Conservatives lying in this forum. That has grown to be the sole claim to fame for YOU, Pixie, and Playon. We are still waiting for you to verify your latest LIE. > I’ve already said where the clause is – can you read?

Back in Feb you stated that there was NO such clause. You then posted a link and told me to find it. I found it. Then you admitted to the existence of the clause, but denied what it meant. It means what it says since amazingly, WORDS mean things! Two days ago, you said that the clause was in the middle of the Agreement. I called you on that and you later admitted that it was NOT in the middle. I them stated that the clause was above Franken’s signature. Then…

> The clause was not right above his signature, so please stop lying.

I will not let your lying by go any more. PROVE the location of the CLAUSE. You know damn well that it was on a page PREVIOUS to the one that Franken signed, you LYING FOOL. You have admitted that the clause was IN the Agreement, so it was either BEFORE or AFTER Franken’s signature. Time to verify your claim and PROVE the location of the clause.

Response:

[snip] >There haven’t been any Conservatives lying in this forum. That has grown to >be the sole claim to fame for YOU, Pixie, and Playon.

[snip] ROTFLMAO — there goes the very last wisp of Wheaton’s credibility, gone up in a microscopic puff of smoke…        Posted via TITANnews – Uncensored Newsgroups Access              >>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<< -=Every Newsgroup – Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

Response:

> Back in Feb you stated that there was NO such clause.

I doubt if I really said that, unless I was confused about what clause we were talking about. > Time to verify your claim and PROVE the location of the clause.

No – you need to do that.  You claimed that Franken signed his name right below the clause & that is NOT true. I guess that makes you aaaaaa LIAR? Mr Soul

Response:

Don’t love you Wheaton?!?!  There’s no arrogance with him. Mr Soul

Response:

> Back in Feb you stated that there was NO such clause. > I doubt if I really said that, unless I was confused about what clause > we were talking about.

You are a vast reservour of doubt and confusion as you prove daily. > Time to verify your claim and PROVE the location of the clause. > No – you need to do that.

> The clause was not right above his signature, so please stop lying.

I asked you verify THAT claim, and you have NOT.

Response:

> There haven’t been any Conservatives lying in this forum

If that wasn’t such a pathetic (and untrue) statement it’d be hilarious.

Response:

> ROTFLMAO — there goes the very last wisp of Wheaton’s credibility, gone > up in a > microscopic puff of smoke…

Please do point out any Conservative that has been lying in this forum as of late, especially with the frequency of Mr Soul, Pixie, and Playon. Also, when there are any posts by anyone Conservative, there are plenty of posters from the Left that go charging in. How many from the Left charged in to correct Gore received a majority of the votes? Not only was that false, others on the Left jumped into affirm that fallacious statement. There are many, many more, but that is enough to make the point. There was a time that there was a certain well known Right Winger that started OT Threads and I did correct a few comments in those, but as of late, have you seen anyone Conservative posting who went unanswered?

Response:

That’s correct – doubt & confusion when it comes to understanding you. Mr Soul

Response:

You’re an asshole.  I admitted that I got the Gore figure wrong, so no-one needed to CHARGE in.  However, I didn’t see any "conservative" come in & dispell you misleading statements about voting for the majority who voted against Gore.  That was plain not true & you bloody know it. In your world, only liberals lie which of course it just not true. Mr Soul

Response:

> You’re an asshole.

You are just tired of getting called on your crap. I admitted that I got the Gore figure wrong, so > no-one needed to CHARGE in.

You made that claim in different YEARS, both times wrong, and both times I corrected you. The problem is not that you were wrong, it is your memory. I’ll correct you and you forget the correction and later DEMAND that I provide info that I had earlier provided at your request. It happens amazingly often. However, I didn’t see any "conservative" > come in & dispell you misleading statements about voting for the > majority who voted against Gore.  That was plain not true & you bloody > know it.

1) I was having some fun at your expense. 2) It was accurate. > In your world, only liberals lie which of course it just not true.

Not true as I have corrected on both sides of the fence but with OT Threads running Lefty 10 to 1, the targets will be a bit skewed.

Response: